In the U.S. we don’t hire faculty members sight
unseen. Typically, a faculty candidate
will travel to the university for a 2-3 day interview, during which time he will
teach a class, do a research presentation and meet with all the faculty and
dean. Here there are no campus
interviews. They don’t even do phone
interviews! Bear in mind this is for a
full time position, so if this person is hired he will stay on faculty full
time, forever. Thus, it is important not
to hire the wrong person.
Rather than ever speaking to job applicants the
hiring decision is made based on a spreadsheet containing information about
each person’s qualifications. We are
expected to look at the information and determine, based on the job posting,
whether each applicant is “appointable.”
“Appointable” means the person meets the required qualifications and is
eligible for hire. If ANYONE on the list
of candidates is appointable, then someone must be hired. Thus, even if we know
we don’t like a person, but that person is appointable, we are expected to hire
that individual.
Ok, now that you have the background information, we
had five applicants for the Lecturer job.
Three were “not appointable” because they either didn’t have a graduate
degree already or were missing some other major requirement. So these three were straightforward. However, the other two were mediocre. We didn’t really like them and didn’t want to
hire them, but they were decent.
However, the department chair insisted we make a ruling on them. And he kept reminding us that if one of them
was deemed apointable that we would have to hire that person. Apparently he must go before a university-wide
board explaining the department’s decision as to who was appointable, who
wasn’t, why the decision was made, and other seemingly bizarre questions.
As I was saying, we didn’t like the two candidates
who appeared to be qualified. Both
candidates had graduate degrees in Environmental Sciences, not Tourism, which
was our preference. We referred back to
the job posting which stated, “Applicants MUST
have: a Master’s Degree in Tourism or RELATED
fields, Bachelor’s Degree in the RELEVANT
discipline, show evidence of engagement of research AND service.” For clarification, I added the capitalizations and
bolding.
We spent no less than an hour discussing whether
Environmental Sciences was a RELATED
field or RELEVANT. Finally, we came to the agreement that it was
related, but not relevant enough to qualify the person to teach Tourism
courses. (Yes, you would have loved to
have been a fly on the wall in this meeting!) However, we still needed to
address the last part of the sentence: whether the person demonstrated
“evidence of research AND
service.” I immediately pointed out
neither candidate had research experience.
To which someone else replied, “Yes, both they both have service.” Naturally I took my observation of the RELATED versus RELEVANT argument and used it to my benefit, “Yes, but the
advertisement states ‘evidence of research AND
service.’ It doesn’t say research OR
service. Since neither have both
research AND service they both fail
to meet the requirements. I vote they
are both unappointable!”
In the end we decided neither candidate met the
requirements and elected not to hire anyone.
It only took 2 hours and 38 minutes to reach that conclusion. I have to admit, after the first hour of this
meeting I think I had a smile plastered on my face permanently because it was
all I could do not to laugh. I just
thought the entire debate about the EXACT meaning of words was ridiculous. But apparently when you are told to “choose
your words carefully” you should really make an effort to do so because you
never know when you are going to have to defend them in a fight to the
death. I believe from now on I will have
to carry a dictionary wherever I go, just in case.
Sounds you like you kicked up quite a storm over defending/defining those words! So much in fact that we are seeing a result right here in Lubbock!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.kcbd.com/story/23073439/dust-from-african-storms-may-blow-into-lubbock-this-week
Bryce, you are my hero. LOLOLL
ReplyDelete